The Treaty of Waitangi for Rights and Property †Free Sample

Question: Discuss about theTreaty of Waitangi forRights and Property. Answer: Introduction: New Zealand is the founder of document of the Treaty of Waitangi, is which was prepared in February 1840. This was made by Queen Victoria of UK. She made for her Royal Favour and to Native Chiefs and Tribes of New Zealand for protecting their Rights and Property and secures them to enjoy Peace and Good Order. Since its first singing of this Treaty, a chronology of events has taken place and finally the Treaty was found a place on the UNESCO Register of the Memory of the World. The Treaty, offers significant impact in health and social life of the region in terms of three guidance principles, viz. partnership, protection and participation(waitangitribunal, 2016). The Three Principles: Partnership: The partnership is related to the continuing relationship which was found with the Crown and Maori. This partnership is involved in pursing action of togetherness through activities with all communities like. iwi, hapu, whanau and Maori in order to ensure development of strategies for the community of Maori regarding health gain related to the services in the field of appropriate health and disability Under this agreement principle of partnership compasses working with all the associated communities to ensure the development strategies for M ori in the areas like health gain, appropriate health and disability services etc. Guiding principle of partnership enable New Zealand, as a nation, where all citizens from all communities(nursingcouncil, 2011). Protection: One of the key guiding principles of the Treaty talks about the protection for the community and its members. Protection, within this Treaty, is to provide appropriate safeguard to M ori culture, values and practices. This principle should be viewed from historical perspective. Policy objectives for protection acknowledge the fact that historically the women from M ori community were facing problems, which could lead to breakdown of M ori society and institution. In terms of culture and social distinctiveness, Waitangi Tribunal with support from the court, has played a pivotal role in spreading social awareness amongst New Zealanders to understand the importance of protection of existing cultural and social distinctiveness of M ori society and institution and in establishing systems and mechanisms to give effect to this principle of societal importance. This importance generates the demands of Maori to get their involvement related to each level of health and disability segment with the inclusion of planning and development along with the core sector of decision making with ensured deliverance in the health and disability sectors related to service to the core sector to ensure planning, development, effective inference with the ensured deliverance of health and disability services. This incident had emphasized involvement of Maori related to all aspects of society(Oh, 2005). Participation: Participation is required for this case is to ensure participation of Maori who are engaged in all levels of the health and disability sector, with the inclusion of planning, development, finding the decision and ensure deliverance of health and disability services. This situation had prioritised the involvement of Maori in each level of society. Principle of participation offers the guidance for M ori society for every levels of the primary sectors. The principle of participation is concerned with strengthening Maori communities in accordance with the needs and aspirations. (Wells, 2005). Cultural Safety: By definition, cultural safety is a concept where safe service practitioners, despite individual social distinctiveness; recognize, respect and acknowledge the rights and customs of others(Waters, 2009). Cultural Safety is more about the attitude of a person than about his / her knowledge of cultures. If someone seems to behave inappropriately (rudely/harshly/negatively) then at first one has to assume that there are some reasons behind it. In a different way, one may think that it does not make any sense but actually they dont know how it makes sense. Someone who knows the cultural context may indicate and point out that the behaviour is not appropriate. The effective implementation of this mission demands the involvement of the government who are bound to ensure through their activities to maintain the level of service in the field of health and impaired features for the community of Maori.in order to safeguard the cultural concepts, the values and the exercises. It is being observed that the Ruler of UK gives recognition of Active Protection for which the government has to prove their proactive attitude in the sector of health promotion which can ensure effective steps to ensure the development of steps for prevention with subsequent strategies. This might be concluded with the meaning of deploying more resources for the purpose of providing the same level of health status which are being enjoyed by non- Maori. Once foundation of these policies is in place, Mori view is suitably added to it. This is known as mainstreaming approach(Funnell, Lawrence, Koutoukidis, 2009). The role of these three principals is identified to understand the area of health and sickness. When these are identified the actions related to health policy and the resources discharged will be easily identifiable to ensure proper discharge of duty by the professionals in the fields of health service and programmes. The main four pillars are identified upon which the health models of Maori are founded: Health of the family Health of the body Health of mind Health for spiritual activities Conventional way of healing is consisting of massages, treatment by herbal agents and spiritual prayer. The features of Traditional healers are that they use to incorporate the spiritual dimension in order to assess for appropriate therapy with the execution of the same in the way which more prone to culturally relevant. A set of processes and a set of guiding principles for cultural safety have been in place to overcome this issue. The process for achieving cultural safety in nursing practice comprises three major steps, viz. Cultural awareness courses which are customised to make sensation to the society with the power of basic ritual and practice, cultural sensitivity alerts to begins a process of self-exploration and introduction of cultural safety as an outcome of cultural awareness and cultural sensitivity(Richardson, 2007). Both within and across cultural groups, cultural safety has been widely recognized in New Zealand as the result of nursing curriculum which can ensure a safe, accurate and welcomed service with the power of four guiding principles as given below. Principle one is related to cultural safety aiming at improving the overall condition of health for all the people of that particular country for the positive growth on health condition to ensure health service to the people of New Zealand. Second Principle of cultural safety emphasizes the area of service of impaired and health services by the help of various nursing workforce with appropriate level of preparation, empowerment and diversity(Liz, 2011). Third principle of cultural safety aims at addressing the impact on political and social relationship with regards to societal parameters like employment status, housing, education, gender etc. Principle four is all about the cultural safety which determines the relationship power in the field of nursing and helps the nurse for dispute settlement. This compiles the general services between nursing culture and the people of New Zealand. References: Funnell, R., Lawrence, K., Koutoukidis, G. (2009). Tabbner's Nursing Care: Theory and Practice. Liz. (2011, June 13). 'Cultural safety' in nursing practice. Retrieved August 31, 2016, from nurseliz8: https://nurseliz8.blogspot.in/2011/06/cultural-safety-in-nursing-practice.html nursingcouncil. (2011, July). Guidelines for Cultural Safety, the Treaty of Waitangi and Maori Health in Nursing Education and Practice. Retrieved August 31, 2016, from nursingcouncil: www.nursingcouncil.org.nz/.../Guidelines%20for%20cultural%20safety,%20the%20T... Oh, M. D. (2005). The Treaty of Waitangi Principles in He Korowai Oranga M ori Health Strategy An Effective Partnership?; https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/arts/Departments/anthropology/documents-publications/MoanaOHthesis.pdf. Richardson, S. (2007, December). Why is cultural safety essential in health care? Retrieved August 31, 2016, from NCBI: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18284111 waitangitribunal. (2016, June 30). The Waitangi Tribunal and the Treaty of Waitangi/Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Retrieved August 31, 2016, from waitangitribunal: https://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/treaty-of-waitangi/ Waters, C. (2009). Cultural Safety; https://www.naho.ca/jah/english/jah05_02/V5_I2_Cultural_01.pdf. Journal of Aboriginal Health , 1-42. Wells, N. (2005, May 05). What are the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi? What should the law do about them? Retrieved August 2016, 2016, from chapmantripp: https://www.chapmantripp.com/publications/Pages/What-are-the-principles-of-the-Treaty-of-Waitangi-What-should-the-law-do-about-them.aspx